Subscribe

RSS Feed (xml)

Powered By

Skin Design:
Free Blogger Skins

Powered by Blogger

Other Article About This Blog

Tampilkan postingan dengan label astrophysics. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label astrophysics. Tampilkan semua postingan

Senin, 03 Desember 2007

Fundamental questions in astrophysisc

In astrophysics, the questions of galaxy formation and evolution are:

* How, from a homogeneous universe, did we obtain the very heterogeneous one we live in?
* How did galaxies form?
* How do galaxies change over time?

After the Big Bang, the universe had a period when it was remarkably homogeneous, as can be observed in the Cosmic Microwave Background, the fluctuations of which are less than one part in one hundred thousand.

The most accepted view today is that all the structure we observe today was formed as a consequence of the growth of primordial fluctuations. The primordial fluctuations caused gas to be attracted to areas of denser material, hierarchically forming superclusters, clusters, galaxies, star clusters and stars. One consequence of this model is that the location of galaxies indicates areas of higher density of the early universe. Hence the distribution of galaxies is closely related to the physics of the early universe.

The observed components of galaxies (including our own Milky Way) that must be explained in, or at least not be at odds with, a theory of galactic evolution, include:

* the stellar disk is quite thin, dense, and rotates
* the stellar halo is very large, sparse, and does not rotate (or has perhaps even a slight retrograde rotation), with no apparent substructure
* halo stars are typically much older and have much lower metallicities than disk stars (there is a correlation, but there is no absolute connection between these data)
* some astronomers have identified an intermediate population of stars, variously called the "metal weak thick disk", the "intermediate population II", et al. If these are indeed a distinct population, they would be described as metal-poor (but not as poor as the halo stars), old (but not as old as the halo stars), and orbiting very near the disk, in a sort of "puffed-up", thicker disk shape.
* globular clusters are typically old and metal-poor as well, but there are a few which are not nearly as metal-poor as most, and/or have some younger stars. Some stars in globular clusters appear to be as old as the universe itself (by entirely different measurement and analysis methods)!
* in each globular cluster, all the stars were born at virtually the same time (except for a few globulars that show multiple epochs of star formation)
* globular clusters with smaller orbits (closer to the galactic center) have orbits which are somewhat flatter (less inclined to the disk), and less eccentric (more circular), while those further out have orbits in all inclinations, and tend to be more eccentric.
* High Velocity Clouds, clouds of neutral hydrogen are "raining" down on the galaxy, and presumably have been from the beginning (these would be the necessary source of a gas disk from which the disk stars formed).

On the 11th July 2007, using the 10 metre Keck II telescope on Mauna Kea, Richard Ellis of the California Institute of Technology at Pasedena and his team found six star forming galaxies about 13.2 billion light years away and therefore created when the universe was only 500 million years old [1].

Recent research as a part of the Galactic Zoo project suggests that there is an unexplained parity violation, with a greater proportion of the galaxies rotating in an anticlockwise direction when seen from the Earth[2].

Galaxy formation and evolution

The formation of galaxies is still one of the most active research areas in astrophysics; and, to some extent, this is also true for galaxy evolution. Some ideas, however, have gained wide acceptance.

Galaxy formation is presently believed to proceed directly from structure formation theories, formed as a result of tiny quantum fluctuations in the wake of the Big Bang. N-body simulations have also been able to predict the types of structures, morphologies, and distribution of galaxies which we observe today both in our present universe, and - by examining distant galaxies - in the early universe.

Jumat, 30 November 2007

Fundamental questions

In astrophysics, the questions of galaxy formation and evolution are:

* How, from a homogeneous universe, did we obtain the very heterogeneous one we live in?
* How did galaxies form?
* How do galaxies change over time?

After the Big Bang, the universe had a period when it was remarkably homogeneous, as can be observed in the Cosmic Microwave Background, the fluctuations of which are less than one part in one hundred thousand.

The most accepted view today is that all the structure we observe today was formed as a consequence of the growth of primordial fluctuations. The primordial fluctuations caused gas to be attracted to areas of denser material, hierarchically forming superclusters, clusters, galaxies, star clusters and stars. One consequence of this model is that the location of galaxies indicates areas of higher density of the early universe. Hence the distribution of galaxies is closely related to the physics of the early universe.

The observed components of galaxies (including our own Milky Way) that must be explained in, or at least not be at odds with, a theory of galactic evolution, include:

* the stellar disk is quite thin, dense, and rotates
* the stellar halo is very large, sparse, and does not rotate (or has perhaps even a slight retrograde rotation), with no apparent substructure
* halo stars are typically much older and have much lower metallicities than disk stars (there is a correlation, but there is no absolute connection between these data)
* some astronomers have identified an intermediate population of stars, variously called the "metal weak thick disk", the "intermediate population II", et al. If these are indeed a distinct population, they would be described as metal-poor (but not as poor as the halo stars), old (but not as old as the halo stars), and orbiting very near the disk, in a sort of "puffed-up", thicker disk shape.
* globular clusters are typically old and metal-poor as well, but there are a few which are not nearly as metal-poor as most, and/or have some younger stars. Some stars in globular clusters appear to be as old as the universe itself (by entirely different measurement and analysis methods)!
* in each globular cluster, all the stars were born at virtually the same time (except for a few globulars that show multiple epochs of star formation)
* globular clusters with smaller orbits (closer to the galactic center) have orbits which are somewhat flatter (less inclined to the disk), and less eccentric (more circular), while those further out have orbits in all inclinations, and tend to be more eccentric.
* High Velocity Clouds, clouds of neutral hydrogen are "raining" down on the galaxy, and presumably have been from the beginning (these would be the necessary source of a gas disk from which the disk stars formed).

On the 11th July 2007, using the 10 metre Keck II telescope on Mauna Kea, Richard Ellis of the California Institute of Technology at Pasedena and his team found six star forming galaxies about 13.2 billion light years away and therefore created when the universe was only 500 million years old [1].

Recent research as a part of the Galactic Zoo project suggests that there is an unexplained parity violation, with a greater proportion of the galaxies rotating in an anticlockwise direction when seen from the Earth[2].

Sabtu, 24 November 2007

Lexicology

The word astronomy literally means "law of the stars" (or "culture of the stars" depending on the translation) and is derived from the Greek αστρονομία, astronomia, from the words άστρον (astron, "star") and νόμος (nomos, "laws or cultures").

Use of terms "astronomy" and "astrophysics"

Generally, either the term "astronomy" or "astrophysics" may be used to refer to this subject.[2][3][4] Based on strict dictionary definitions, "astronomy" refers to "the study of objects and matter outside the earth's atmosphere and of their physical and chemical properties"[5]and "astrophysics" refers to the branch of astronomy dealing with "the behavior, physical properties, and dynamic processes of celestial objects and phenomena".[6] In some cases, as in the introduction of the introductory textbook The Physical Universe by Frank Shu, "astronomy" may be used to describe the qualitative study of the subject, whereas "astrophysics" is used to describe the physics-oriented version of the subject.[7] However, since most modern astronomical research deals with subjects related to physics, modern astronomy could actually be called astrophysics.[2] Various departments that research this subject may use "astronomy" and "astrophysics", partly depending on whether the department is historically affiliated with a physics department,[3] and many professional astronomers actually have physics degrees.[4] Even the name of the scientific journal Astronomy & Astrophysics reveals the ambiguity of the use of the term.

Astronomy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Astronomy is the scientific study of celestial objects (such as stars, planets, comets, and galaxies) and phenomena that originate outside the Earth's atmosphere (such as the cosmic background radiation). It is concerned with the evolution, physics, chemistry, meteorology, and motion of celestial objects, as well as the formation and development of the universe.

Astronomy is one of the oldest sciences. Astronomers of early civilizations performed methodical observations of the night sky, and astronomical artifacts have been found from much earlier periods. However, the invention of the telescope was required before astronomy was able to develop into a modern science. Historically, astronomy has included disciplines as diverse as astrometry, celestial navigation, observational astronomy, the making of calendars, and even astrology, but professional astronomy is nowadays often considered to be synonymous with astrophysics. Since the 20th century, the field of professional astronomy split into observational and theoretical branches. Observational astronomy is focused on acquiring and analyzing data, mainly using basic principles of physics. Theoretical astronomy is oriented towards the development of computer or analytical models to describe astronomical objects and phenomena. The two fields complement each other, with theoretical astronomy seeking to explain the observational results, and observations being used to confirm theoretical results.

Amateur astronomers have contributed to many important astronomical discoveries, and astronomy is one of the few sciences where amateurs can still play an active role, especially in the discovery and observation of transient phenomena.

Old or even ancient astronomy is not to be confused with astrology, the belief system that claims that human affairs are correlated with the positions of celestial objects. Although the two fields share a common origin and a part of their methods (namely, the use of ephemerides), they are distinct.[1]

Article

Feeds Article